Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Dave Page escribió: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> That is actually precisely my point. It makes *no sense* to filter based on >>> 8.x. 8.0 is no more a major release than 7.4. >> Yes it is - that's precisely why it was 8.0 and not 7.5. > > That was merely a marketing artifact; it was called 7.5 until the very > end of the devel cycle. > Yes, but marketing is one reason why someone might want to group 8.x, 7.x etc on a website which is exactly the sort of thing this code is for. As others have said, yes, you could do it but looking at a substring of the version, and yes, you could do it with mathematical comparisons on major.minor (with limitations - what happens if we get to 8.10 ?), but would we suggest people use those techniques for searching their databases for matching records, or would we suggest storing the interesting elements in different columns for ease of use, flexibility and efficiency? How does this differ (aside from the obvious)? Regards, Dave
