On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 02:44:42PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:18:52PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > But given that we might want to add things like this, having our own custom > > XML format certainly makes a bit more sense, it might be harder to try to > > trick it into RSS. > > I'd say do it in the format you're most comfortable with. Then some > XSLT wizard can convert it into RSS from there... Too late, I already did the RSS. Which was very simple, because of the RSS framework stuff already in place on the website. *However*, that one doesn't contain all the information that a program would want, and certainly not in an easily parseable format for them. It's designed for people in the other end. So I intend to do a "proper XML format" as well. //Magnus
