Jaime Silvela <JSilvela@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Wow, thanks! I'll definitely get the Unix operations guys to investigate. > Do you know if this is tracked as an issue for Linux? I'd like some > reassurance that whatever release Unix Ops is able to upgrade to fixes > the bug. I did some idle searching when we were looking at the previous report but couldn't find any specific kernel patches about this. It's presumably known on the kernel side but maybe not under the specific "lseek reports stale EOF position" guise that we know it as. If you manage to track it down please do post back here, because we'd all like to know. regards, tom lane
