Search Postgresql Archives

Re: How to recognize obsolete WAL logs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/19/07, Jan Poslusny <pajout@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
I participate on realization of warm standby pg 8.2.3, according to
documentation. Mostly all works fine, but one problem remains. The
recovering rdbms eats transfered wal logs fluently, but I cannot see the
way how to recognize if the recovered wal log file is really processed
into db and, consequently, is obsolete and does not need to be archived
for this recovery. Specially, when recovering rdbms is stopped, some wal
log can be processed (and automatically deleted), but the rdbms asks the
same file after restart in recovery mode. Is it some way how to
recognize such logs?
I know that I should keep base backup AND all wal logs after
pg_start_backup, but my question is NOT about safe archiving, but about
log shipping.

you should check out the pg_standby utility.  They solved the problem
by letting you set the maximum amount of files in your archive
transfer folder, which should be the maximum amount of WAL traffic you
would see between checkpoints plus a good safety margin.  It works...

merlin


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux