Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Possible planner bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Possible planner bug?
From: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:30:48 -0400
Cc: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Comments: In-reply-to Jeff Davis <pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxx> message dated "Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:09:40 -0700"
In-reply-to: <1174079380.23455.352.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1174079380.23455.352.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Jeff Davis <pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The planner chooses what looks to me like a very strange plan for this
> query:

Exactly which PG version is this?

			regards, tom lane

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible planner bug?
  - From: Jeff Davis

References:
- Possible planner bug?
  - From: Jeff Davis

Prev by Date: Re: Lifecycle of PostgreSQL releases
Next by Date: Re: Practical question.
Previous by thread: Possible planner bug?
Next by thread: Re: Possible planner bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux