Jorge Godoy wrote: > "Dave Page" <dpage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> ------- Original Message ------- >>> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: Dave Page <dpage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: 15/03/07, 23:51:18 >>> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dumpall and version confusion >>> >>> If you want that, create a wrapper program that calls to different >>> statically compiled versions of pg_dump. >> I can't even begin to imagine how difficult that would be on Windows! > > As difficult as a new ".bat" file? > Thats the easy bit. The difficult bit is building the statically linked utilities with ssl, gettext and kerberos support. We found when porting PostgreSQL in the first place that for many of the supporting libraries, Windows is an afterthought and where on unix there might be static and dynamic builds, on Windows once dynamic is done, static doesn't matter. Regards, Dave
