-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/24/07 11:00, Tom Lane wrote: > "Tomi N/A" <hefest@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> ...which made me think: postgresql aims at the same (or very similar) >> clients and use cases as Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL. I pose the question >> from an advocacy standpoint: why doesn't postgresql hold a world >> record of some sort (except performance/price)? > > Certified TPC tests are *expensive* to run. If you search the PG > archives for "TPC" you will probably find some relevant prior > discussions. What about non-certified tests? Or has the TPC copyrighted/licensed/whatever the tests, so that you can only publish certified results? > FWIW, Josh has given the impression that Sun is working on producing > certified TPC-E results with PG. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF4HM5S9HxQb37XmcRArtIAJ0avsmTuu5QxLW3KrGEpdm2zcB5UACgoDzN X+yxEw0miUXDjMkKeMkRt5E= =6OBF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
