Magnus Hagander wrote: > Just to make things clear, this wouldn't be about another auth method. > Windows has an API to store arbitrary passwords in a "secure way". At > least it does in XP+, not sure if it was in 2000. Would it really solve Tony's problem though? I'm not familiar with the API you're thinking of, but do be useful to us it must be able to give the unencrypted passwords back to us, and therefore anything else pretending to be us. Regards, Dave.
