Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Database performance comparison paper.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Postgresql General <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Database performance comparison paper.
From: Guido Neitzer <lists@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:07:57 -0700
In-reply-to: <45D4BD0F.5000101@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20070215132025.O54198@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45D4BD0F.5000101@xxxxxxxx>

Am 15.02.2007 um 13:05 schrieb Alexander Elgert:

Nice, but it would be interesting which storage engine was used formysql - ok, default is MyIsam.


They used MyISAM as it is described late in the paper.

cug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Database performance comparison paper.
  - From: Marc Evans
- Re: Database performance comparison paper.
  - From: Alexander Elgert

Prev by Date: Re: Why *exactly* is date_trunc() not immutable ?
Next by Date: Re: complex referential integrity constraints
Previous by thread: Re: Database performance comparison paper.
Next by thread: Re: Database performance comparison paper.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux