Search Postgresql Archives

Re: replication choices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just to be clear, this effectively means I double my database writes, correct?

On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:17:40PM -0800, Ben wrote:
the remote sites back to the central site, each remote site needs to have
a normal slony node first, which I don't have the hardware for.

An answer for this, though a dirty kludge, is to replicate to another
database in the same cluster.  This is really no more load than the
single replication user, although it is expensive at the disk level.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
		--Philip Greenspun

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

              http://archives.postgresql.org/



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux