On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:19, Tim Tassonis wrote: > > The FSF says the MPL is not compatible with the GPL, but, well, the FSF > > generally finds **all** non-GPL licenses incompatible with the GPL (BSD, > > MPL, Apache, etc.). The only truly GPL-compatible license I know of is > > LGPL (and there have been arguments about that). That’s the problem > > with the GPL. You’re not agreeing to open source your code as much as > > you’re agreeing to abide by the FSF’s political beliefs. Political > > lock-in for developers in lieu of vendor lock-in for end-users. > > Quite political stuff in a technical posting from somebody apparently > disliking mixing politics and open source, eh? > > It's been said a million times by BSD advocats: put one line of code > under GPL and you instantly become a willingless slave of Richard > Stallmans hoards of children-eating communists. That's ridiculous. Everybody knows that they're more socialists at heart.
