-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/30/07 14:41, Tony Caduto wrote: > Mark Walker wrote: >> It's sort of a matter of taste, but there are lots of people who like >> to keep there logic on the server or at least within sql statements, >> so there's probably a good sized market that your not reaching if you >> ignore it. >> > That is a good point, I and many developers I know like to keep all the > business logic on the server in stored procedure and functions and > having this ability as a native part of Postgresql would be a huge > advantage. > DBlink is a decent workaround,but it becomes a pain having to wrap > everything with the dblink syntax, plus there is a little bit of > overhead involved creating a connection over TCP/IP to run a query on > the same server. DBlink is great when you need to connect to a > different server though. True distributed transactions would be handy, though. Many of our design decisions might have been different had they been available. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFv7FZS9HxQb37XmcRAjtPAJ9/eXPPp7xcOWYPhfkNVYudAeXB+wCfU96x 9ENICnZnVmYj59GB7niatyY= =aQsm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
