-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/07 16:05, tom wrote: > No. > Postgres does not represent an economic entity that can compete for $$ > with Oracle. > > It's also not nearly as popular. And I mean that in a very pop-culture > way. > How long did it take Oracle to support Linux? Only when it became > "pop"ular to do so. > > Who would they target anyways? > There's no one company.... They could buy out CommandPrompt and EnterpriseDB... The buyouts wouldn't *kill* pg, but they would wound it mightily. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFvnRGS9HxQb37XmcRAjA7AJ96LsBV2af16AjNcuSMLnQT6TvhmgCdESzN 17BSJ6ujxPwkebKwCbBEuy4= =kZ5Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
