Jan van der Weijde wrote: > Thank you. > It is true he want to have the first few record quickly and then > continue with the next records. However without LIMIT it already takes a > very long time before the first record is returned. > I reproduced this with a table with 1.1 million records on an XP machine > and in my case it took about 25 seconds before the select returned the > first record. I tried it both interactively with pgAdmin and with a > C-application using a cursor (with hold). Both took about the same time. Are you sure you don't retrieve the entire result set first, and only start iterating it after that? Notably the fact that LIMIT changes this behaviour seems to point in that direction. A quick calculation shows that (provided my assumption holds true) fetching each record takes about 12.5 usec on average (25s / 2m records). A quick test on our dev-db fetches (~40k records) in 5 usec average, so that looks reasonable to me (apples and oranges, I know). -- Alban Hertroys alban@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx magproductions b.v. T: ++31(0)534346874 F: ++31(0)534346876 M: I: www.magproductions.nl A: Postbus 416 7500 AK Enschede // Integrate Your World //
