Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Index vacuum improvements in 8.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Index vacuum improvements in 8.2
From: Joseph Shraibman <jks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:59:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <C1C2DA91.3A6C2%wespvp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services
References: <C1BA9837.39CBB%wespvp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <C1C2DA91.3A6C2%wespvp@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0

8.0.x has the problem that VACUUM FULL on a table does not reclaim spacefrom the indexes, and I have to issue a separate REINDEX command. Hasthis been fixed in later versions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Index vacuum improvements in 8.2
  - From: Alvaro Herrera

References:
- Index vacuum improvements in 8.2
  - From: Wes
- Re: Index vacuum improvements in 8.2
  - From: Wes

Prev by Date: Re: Questions about horizontal partitioning
Next by Date: Database "postgres"
Previous by thread: Re: Index vacuum improvements in 8.2
Next by thread: Re: Index vacuum improvements in 8.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux