Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Database versus filesystem for storing images

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5 Jan 2007 06:59:18 -0800, imageguy <imageguy1206@xxxxxxxxx>:

I think I know the answer,

If you know the answer please tell it as I have read some discussions
on the web and although I have decided on a solution I'm still not
sure about the best answer, if there is a best answer after all.

but if you don't have an "application
server" - ie a webserver, etc,

Yes I have an application server, the Apache server.

and many of the workstations/clients
that need access to the images but may not have access to a network
share,

network share? I don't understand. The images will be loaded by html
pages with the img tag like in <img
src="http://domain.com/images/xxx.jpg";>

isn't the database the only choice ?

No. It is one of the choices. The other is to store the images in the
file system, in a directory readable by Apache.

 - or is there a postgresql function/utility that will "server" the
file from the file system based on the reference/link embeded in the
database ??

I think some procedure languages can read files. In this case what
would be the gain in introducing a middle man, the db server?

Regards,
--
Clodoaldo Pinto Neto


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux