Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Function Scan on "getTimeSeries" (cost=0.00..12.50 rows=1000 width=24) (actual time=11065.981..11067.008 rows=262 loops=1)
Total runtime: 11067.991 ms
(2 rows)

It is a PL function.  Do I need to break it down?

A. Kretschmer wrote:
am  Sat, dem 23.12.2006, um 11:26:08 -0800 mailte Benjamin Arai folgendes:
because it would literally take over a week to complete. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

What says an 'explain analyse'?


Andreas


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux