On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 16:23 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote: > > To be fair, he was running the cluster on a 100Mbps network. Depending > > on his setup, that may have been his bottleneck. However, there's a good > > chance that's not his only problem. Especially if he's so sold on MySQL > > Cluster that he's trying to find a place to use it. > > No, read on, he upgraded to gigabit halfway through the thread, and went > from 50 to 70 tps. > Wow, that's bad. This debunks the myth that native replication is inherently easier to use or inherently better in some way. They spent a whole thread talking about it, and still couldn't get half the performance of a single PG box. Regards, Jeff Davis
