Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:04, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
This link adds to the joy...
http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181
So the most popular free "database" in the world is a lousy performing
product that accepts 'gabba gabba hey' as a valid timestamp. Someone
please, give me a reason not to get cynical...
Oh man, that poor guy. He's got 4 or 5 machines in a cluster, and he's
still not catching up to the one machine postgresql server.
And he's switching because he wants better reliability?
Guess he's never heard of pgpool, slony, mammoth replicator, cjdbc, or a
half dozen other ways to get high reliability with postgresql.
I wonder what version of postgresql he was testing.
Please, remove pgpool from your list of "reliable" postgresql tools.
It's decent, but child procs tend to go zombie from time to time.
--
erik jones <erik@xxxxxxxxxx>
software development
emma(r)
