On 11/28/06, Olexandr Melnyk <omelnyk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2006/11/28, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Mono 1.2 only fully supports .net 1.1 (for winforms) Yes. But it already supports most of the .NET 2.0 features (not talking of WinForms here) including the ones metioned above and has a C# 2.0 compiler. > What kind of problems have you seen with the VCL as a project matures? As I've already mentioned, it's not layout-based. Anchors only partially solve the task, so problems can still appear when adding extra languages
interfaces to the application. Also, VCL is quite incomplete. Say, how much sense does it make for button not to have color property, while other components, like edit, label and check box have it? There are similar situations with other objects, when it seems odd, why it doesn't have a certain feature/property.
there are many components that solve this. I was quite astounded when windows.forms came out that it did not have a functional grid component. While mono/c# is nice, I greatly prefer the TDataset interface to ado.net middleware. There are some VCL based database middlewares, like zeos, which completely outclass odbc. For a general purpose language, lately I've been taking a really good look at 'D', which looks to be an amazing language. Has anybody tried to hook up postgresql to D? merlin