On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > =?iso-8859-2?Q?Marcin_Ma=F1k?= <marcin.mank@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > I have an unconfirmed feeling that autovac does not like system-wide > > statement_timeout. > > If you have it set to less than the time needed to do a vacuum, then > yes, autovac will fail. You expected differently? Do you think it's > a good idea for autovac to ignore statement_timeout? (Maybe it is, > but I suspect we'd get complaints about that too.) Autovac *must* ignore statement_timeout if it is doing a wraparound avoidance scan, surely? -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
