Have you run analyze on all the three tables since creating the
database?
What On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 02:31 +0100, Thomas H. wrote:
> hi list.
>
> as soon as i left-join an additional table, the query takes 24sec instead of
> 0.2sec, although the added fields have no impact on the resultset:
>
> --------------------
> SELECT * FROM shop.dvds
> LEFT JOIN oldtables.movies ON mov_id = dvd_mov_id
> WHERE (lower(mov_name) LIKE '%superman re%' OR lower(dvd_name) like
> '%superman re%' OR lower(dvd_edition) LIKE '%superman re%')
> --------------------
> Hash Left Join (cost=8402.16..10733.16 rows=39900 width=1276) (actual
> time=260.712..260.722 rows=2 loops=1)
> Hash Cond: (dvds.dvd_mov_id = movies.mov_id)
> Filter: ((lower((movies.mov_name)::text) ~~ '%superman re%'::text) OR
> (lower((dvds.dvd_edition)::text) ~~ '%superman re%'::text))
> -> Seq Scan on dvds (cost=0.00..1292.00 rows=39900 width=1062) (actual
> time=0.036..23.594 rows=20866 loops=1)
> -> Hash (cost=8194.93..8194.93 rows=82893 width=214) (actual
> time=168.121..168.121 rows=37417 loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on movies (cost=0.00..8194.93 rows=82893 width=214)
> (actual time=0.024..131.401 rows=37417 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 264.193 ms
> 2 rows fetched
> --------------------
>
> now, an additional table (containing 600k records) is added through a left
> join. all the sudden the query takes 24sec. although there are indices on
> both dvds.dvd_ean and data_soundmedia.sm_info_ean, the planer does not make
> use of the indices but rather chooses to do 2 seq-scans.
>
> --------------------
> SELECT * FROM shop.dvds
> LEFT JOIN oldtables.movies ON mov_id = dvd_mov_id
> LEFT JOIN shop.data_soundmedia ON sm_info_ean = dvd_ean
> WHERE (lower(mov_name) LIKE '%superman re%' OR lower(dvd_name) like
> '%superman re%' OR lower(dvd_edition) LIKE '%superman re%')
> --------------------
> Hash Left Join (cost=317592.21..326882.92 rows=159086 width=1936) (actual
> time=21021.023..22242.253 rows=2 loops=1)
> Hash Cond: (dvds.dvd_mov_id = movies.mov_id)
> Filter: ((lower((movies.mov_name)::text) ~~ '%superman re%'::text) OR
> (lower((dvds.dvd_name)::text) ~~ '%superman re%'::text) OR
> (lower((dvds.dvd_edition)::text) ~~ '%superman re%'::text))
> -> Merge Left Join (cost=309190.05..313899.09 rows=159086 width=1722)
> (actual time=19876.552..21902.007 rows=20866 loops=1)
> Merge Cond: ("outer"."?column20?" = "inner"."?column29?")
> -> Sort (cost=23027.68..23127.43 rows=39900 width=1062) (actual
> time=507.886..520.143 rows=20866 loops=1)
> Sort Key: (dvds.dvd_ean)::text
> -> Seq Scan on dvds (cost=0.00..1292.00 rows=39900
> width=1062) (actual time=0.047..100.415 rows=20866 loops=1)
> -> Sort (cost=286162.37..287781.38 rows=647601 width=660) (actual
> time=19336.011..20328.247 rows=646633 loops=1)
> Sort Key: (data_soundmedia.sm_info_ean)::text
> -> Seq Scan on data_soundmedia (cost=0.00..31080.01
> rows=647601 width=660) (actual time=0.074..2834.831 rows=647601 loops=1)
> -> Hash (cost=8194.93..8194.93 rows=82893 width=214) (actual
> time=177.033..177.033 rows=37417 loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on movies (cost=0.00..8194.93 rows=82893 width=214)
> (actual time=0.118..129.716 rows=37417 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 24419.939 ms
> 2 rows fetched
> --------------------
>
> shouldn't the planer join the additional table *after* filtering? even if it
> does first joining then filtering, why isn't the existing index not used?
>
> pgsql is 8.2beta2
>
> thanks,
> thomas
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
