On Thursday 02 November 2006 00:16, Richard Huxton wrote: > Uwe C. Schroeder wrote: > > why don't you just use < '00:00:00'::time > > and avoid the issue? > > > > IMHO there shouldn't even be a 24:00:00, because that would imply that > > there is a 24:00:01 - which there is not. > > It should go from 23:59 to 00:00 > > But then, I didn't write the spec for time in general, so maybe there is > > a 24:00 which is identical to 00:00 > > Ah, times and dates are wonderful things though. For example, '23:59:60' > is a valid time (and not equal to 24:00:00 or 00:00:00) every so often. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Yeah, but isn't the third part milliseconds? Doesn't "milli" imply 1000 and not 60. I may be totally off here though - well, it's getting late UC -- Open Source Solutions 4U, LLC 1618 Kelly St Phone: +1 707 568 3056 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Cell: +1 650 302 2405 United States Fax: +1 707 568 6416
