-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 'k, the message you sent had: > was executed with status: > 0 (failure) which indicates it failed ... do you have a corresponding URL @ archives that shows that it did go through that I can check against? - --On Friday, October 27, 2006 18:44:52 -0300 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > was executed with status: > 0 (failure) > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >> - --On Friday, October 27, 2006 15:54:41 -0300 Alvaro Herrera >> <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> > Anyway I wonder why it does report "failure", when the messages do make >> > it through the list to all subscribers and the archives. Shouldn't it >> > report "success" it that case? >> >> You shouldn't see anything on successful posts ... at least, I haven't been >> ... > > Well, that's what I'm reporting -- for the successful posts I do get a > message. > >> > (The messages rejected by moderators don't get reported at all.) >> >> No reason for it, since you are the one that rejected it, would be kinda >> redundant to email you to remind yourself that you've rejected it, no? :) > > Certainly. (Really I don't need any reminder of anything, much less a > reminder that a message was just successfully posted to the list). > > -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ > The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@xxxxxxx MSN . scrappy@xxxxxxx Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFQoB74QvfyHIvDvMRAjn6AKCNhh29gVXzMIOQ7WpO/3nwUSYwqACgv+LU 5dn772fXxiAhFnCzWz0DEEk= =VuKr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
