On 10/19/2006 10:13:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Karl O. Pinc" <kop@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> I would expect that because a row exists, even
> though the value assigned is NULL, FOUND would
> be TRUE. Are my expectations wrong?
No, but I think your code is. Please provide a test case
demonstrating
this behavior.
Thanks for the reply. I suspect you're right.
After lots of investigation what seems to be happening
is that I'm putting data in in the wrong order....
Karl <kop@xxxxxxxx>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
