Search Postgresql Archives

RES: RES: RES: RES: Dates rejected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, it is the 8.0.8 version.

You mean that changes to /etc/localtime should not reflect in the
to_timestamp behavior? Strange, why does to_timestamp behavior changed here
when the /etc/localtime was overlaped?

Well, maybe the PG refresh I´ve done after changing the /etc/localtime did
it (pg_ctl restart).

Anyway, if it will not look at the /etc/localtime, how PG will discover the
DST changes?

Thank you in advance!

Carlos


> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Enviada em: terça-feira, 17 de outubro de 2006 00:02
> Para: carlos.reimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Pgsql-General@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <carlos.reimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > To discover if it works this way I´ve changed the
> /etc/localtime to relect
> > the following timezone:
>
> Um ... what PG version are you working with?  8.0 and up don't pay
> attention to /etc/localtime, because they have their own timezone info.
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>
>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux