On Wednesday 11 October 2006 10:42, A. Kretschmer wrote: > am Wed, dem 11.10.2006, um 12:56:51 -0400 mailte Tom Lane folgendes: > > Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Joe Kramer <cckramer@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb: > > >> I want to get: > > >> item_id | last_update > > >> ------------------------------------- > > >> 32 | 1234-12-12 12:12:12 > > > > > > Untested: > > > SELECT item_id, last_update from public.new_item(3,2); > > > > Or just > > SELECT * FROM public.new_item(3,2); > > Yes, but i have learned, that 'SELECT * ...' is evil... Well, "SELECT *" is only evil if your application relies on a specific column order to function. The moment you change the table layout and you're using "select *" your application will cease functioning. My app uses tons of select *, but then I wrote an object mapper that queries the information schema at startup - so it's aware of table changes and adjusts accordingly. Uwe -- Open Source Solutions 4U, LLC 1618 Kelly St Phone: +1 707 568 3056 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Cell: +1 650 302 2405 United States Fax: +1 707 568 6416