Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Is relpages always supposed to be right?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Alex Turner <armtuk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is relpages always supposed to be right?
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:47:14 -0400
Cc: pgsql general <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <33c6269f0609221338ta1602b7x124c9f285047b129@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Alex Turner <armtuk@xxxxxxxxx>, pgsql general <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <33c6269f0609221338ta1602b7x124c9f285047b129@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

Alex Turner wrote:
> Is relpages always supposed to be right?:

No, it's only updated on VACUUM, ANALYZE, CREATE INDEX, and perhaps
REINDEX.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Is relpages always supposed to be right?
  - From: Alex Turner

Prev by Date: Is relpages always supposed to be right?
Next by Date: Re: Postgres Team: Thank You All
Previous by thread: Is relpages always supposed to be right?
Next by thread: powerset?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux