On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:31:26AM +0200, Sim Zacks wrote: > > I think the reason you are seeing failures in the first function is > > that the initial DELETE is a no-op so it doesn't serialize anything, > > and then there is conflict when the two INSERTs proceed in parallel. > > Here is a simple, reproducible example that delete doesn't cause it to use > serial: I wonder if you set the transaction mode to "serializable" whether that would make a difference. In standard read-committed the way it works below seems to be what's expected (each transaction sees what was committed at the time is ran). Have a ncie day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
