Am 2006-09-15 08:41:00, schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> Why didn't it truncate Michelle's but did truncate yours?
From the Mutt-Manual:
``All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less.'' -me, circa 1995
Thats why I love it (even it has no GUI) and it is very strong
RFC-Compliant plus resolving Bugs from MTA's and other MUA's.
> FYI, I've seen this on my messages (mutt), yours (also mutt), and
> Bruce's (elm). I find it strange that Michelle's mutt didn't do the
> same.
Do you run a "real" mutt or mutt-ng?
I have:
mutt:
Installed: 1.5.9-2
Candidate: 1.5.9-2
Version Table:
*** 1.5.9-2 0
200 http://sarge.debian.tamay-dogan.net sarge/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
the one on my Toshiba T1950CT (486dx50, 12 MB of memory)
is older and from Debian/Woody and works too. Same for
the lates version from Debian/Unstable
> Maybe it's not Majordomo at all, but I haven't seen it anywhere else
> (for example on lists I am that are managed with Mailman, on spanish,
> carrying lots of non-ASCII chars in subjects, I don't think I've ever
> seen a truncated subject).
:-)
This is, why I was wondering about it.
I use mutt since 1999/03 and never seen a truncated Subject: header.
Greetings and nice Weekend
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
