Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > The only part of this that I see as relevant to us is setting of > > development goals. And we've already discussed this ad nauseum on the > > Hackers list and AFAIK have an initial plan (the enhanced TODO), lacking > > only the resources to implement it this month. > > Almost the whole thing is relevant :). Keep in mind that I am not saying I totally agree! > that it is negative. For example the NetBSD core is obviously cranked, > where our Core tends to stay out of the way. That is a positive. > > On the other hand, we do suffer from the locked project problem (the > recent recursive query debacle is a perfect example). Yep, but fortunately this problem doesn't happen to us often. > Anyway, the post as I said was for provoking thought, not for > antagonistic measures. I saw good and bad and thought it would be good > for everyone to review as we are as a project dealing with some of our > own growth problems. Yes. There are lessons to be learned. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@xxxxxxxxxx EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
