Csaba Nagy wrote:
The code is possible to be executed in parallel by multiple threads, on different connections, or in sequence on the same connection. I would expect it in both cases to work correctly... in manual tests I was able to create in parallel temporary tables named identically in different connections, and on the same connection after rolling back the transaction which created the first table... so I don't know what to try to trigger this. Any ideas what's the problem ?
Are you sure that you're not re-using an existing connection from a pool? -- Alban Hertroys alban@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx magproductions b.v. T: ++31(0)534346874 F: ++31(0)534346876 M: I: www.magproductions.nl A: Postbus 416 7500 AK Enschede // Integrate Your World //
