Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Atomicity?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Naz Gassiep wrote:
  
If the violation of the constraint really is being caused
WITHIN the query, doesn't that violate the principle of atomicity?
I.e., operations and entities should be considered a single entire
construct rather than a collection of smaller, discrete parts.
    

The principle of atomicity merely says that transactions are either 
performed entirely or not at all.  If the transaction is not performed, 
then there is no violation of atomicity.

  
conwatch=# UPDATE replies SET rgt = rgt + 2 WHERE postid = 18 AND rgt
    
= 11;
      
ERROR:  duplicate key violates unique constraint "replies_rgt_postid"
    

This is a well-known deficiency in PostgreSQL.  You will have to work 
around it somehow (by changing the query, the schema, or the index).
  
Do we have an ETA on fixing it? Or is it a long term outstanding issue with no ETA as yet?
Thanks for the reply,
- Naz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux