Search Postgresql Archives

Re: alternative to using a sequence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



snacktime <snacktime@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I have an application that processes financial transactions.  Each of
> these transactions needs to be sent with a sequence number.  It starts
> at 1 and resets to 1 once it hits 8000.   I'm trying to think of the
> most elegant solution without having to create a sequence for each
> user (there are hundreds).  There is a table that holds the
> configuration parameters for each merchant, so a field in that table
> to hold the sequence number would be ideal.  In the past I've used
> sequences as well as just a field which I query then update.  Any
> other ideas?

Take a look at http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/

There are some ideas there.  Of course, gapless sequences perform a bit worse
than sequences.  There was this discussion here on the ML last week as well,
so in the archives you'll find even more things to think.

-- 
Jorge Godoy      <jgodoy@xxxxxxxxx>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux