> I don't see how checkpoint_timeout is relevant. Just because we > checkpoint doesn't mean the WAL file will get archived. I have to have > 16M of WAL traffic before a file gets archived regardless of > check-pointing, or am I missing something? Right, I think ;-) If you want finer-grained backup, you have to do something like rsync the current WAL file frequently. -- Scott Ribe scott_ribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.killerbytes.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice
