Thanks. 'connect to' cannot be sent to server as plain text, surely. I'm stupid :-( On 8/4/06, Stephan Szabo <sszabo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: > On 8/4/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] > > BTW, difference vanishes due to expression power of SQL - > > it supports session comands in the same context as DDL commands and > > data manipulation stmts (SQL:200n, 4.33.2.5 'SQL-connection > > statements'). > > Sorry, I already see my failure. It is in the fact that Postgres > doesn't support that connection statements yet (but some connection > things are supported - like changing the CURRENT_ROLE). > > So, my previous message is interesting only from theoretical point of > view. I always try to thing in the manner of SQL standard or use > knowledge from books/university ... > > But the logic is clear, isn't it? Connection is not client operation. I'd read 4.39 differently which seems to imply that the SQL-client handles the connection statements.
-- Best regards, Nikolay
