Search Postgresql Archives

Re: pg_restore performance on solaris 10/6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Aug 1, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Vivek Khera wrote:


On Jul 31, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Thomas Burns wrote:

our database literally takes 8 times longer on the x4200 as it does on OS X (the x4200 hardware should be considerably faster -- it has better

for a restore like this, bump up the value of checkpoint_segments to some large value (I use 256 -- but I have a dedicated partition for the pg_xlog directory which gets big).

will give that a shot


also, the normal tuning of the shared memory settings apply. how much RAM do you have and what kind of disks are you using?

I have 50000 shared buffers and 10000 temp buffers (the machine has 16G ram). The disks are new/fast SCSI drives




Thomas E. Burns
Co-Founder/CTO, Schoolloop.com
http://www.schoolloop.com
tombu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
415.255.7285





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux