> plPHP is not as mature as plTcl (or is that plTclng). However it is very > well developed and maintained. Heck, companies are even holding talks and > training classes on it now. What is lacking in plPHP? To be honest, even though I am a Tcl developer I would rather develop in PHP, and I know next to NOTHING about PHP! The thing is that Tcl leaves a bad taste in a lot of programmer's mouths - and I can't blame them. PHP looks and behaves like a "normal" programming language, so there's more likelyhood that other programmers will be able to maintain my code. (Imagine that - a developer worrying about how the NEXT developer will maintain his code! Think the idea will catch on?) I couldn't find a recent release of plPHP, and have no idea of its status. Carlo
