Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Best high availability solution ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Page <dpage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Best high availability solution ?
From: Arnaud Lesauvage <thewild@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:07:53 +0200
Cc: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4013885C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4013885C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)

Dave Page a écrit :

http://developer.pgadmin.org/~hiroshi/Slony-I/
That's built against 8.1 iirc.


Great !

USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!! IT MAY EAT YOUR DATA AND SET YOUR SERVER ON FIRE :-)


I'll keep an eye on it then ! ;-)

--
Arnaud

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Re: Best high availability solution ?
  - From: Dave Page

Prev by Date: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Next by Date: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Previous by thread: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Next by thread: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux