On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:19:25AM +0200, Csaba Nagy wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 23:55, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > BTW, there's a bug/issue with CLUSTER that makes it not entirely > > transaction safe. > > For God's sake, don't fix that one ! I rely on it... now seriously, > until there's a way to tell the DB that an exclusive lock is enough to > vacuum all dead rows, even if they would be visible by other > transactions, CLUSTER is the only thing I can use to circumvent the long > running transaction syndrome. I believe it's already fixed in HEAD/8.2. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
