> -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Caduto [mailto:tony_caduto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 12 May 2006 21:24 > To: Dave Page; pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface > > Dave calm down....take a chill pill... > who said anything about pgAdmin III? Jim was referring to > the tools used to build PGLA, not PGLA itself :-) At least > that is what I thought he was blabbing about. > In this particular case the part that is far superior and > more productive is Borland Delphi and even Visual Studio .net Yes, misunderstanding - please see my previous email. > What the heck is slating? All I am doing is saying there is > a alternative, nothing wrong with that :-) Slating == berating. I think it's hard to deny with so many mentions of pgAdmin on your site, and no mentions of any other similar product that when you say 'PGLA does this better', or 'has all these extra features' that the intention is that the user assume you are directly comparing to pgAdmin rather than any other product. I wouldn't mind if it were all true, but it is not - the list of features that are not found 'in other products' contains many that are in pgAdmin, likewise you have at least one quote that says something like 'everything in pgAdmin is a dialogue' which is also untrue. Maybe that's because you don't expect us to sue you like another company might (and you'd be right), I don't know - perhaps you could prove me wrong by comparing features of PGLA with Tora or EMS PostgreSQL Manager as well for example? Regards, Dave
