On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:19:50 -0400, Kynn Jones <kynnjo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I keep bumping against this situation: I have a main database A, and I want > to implement a database B, that is distinct from A, but subordinate to it, > meaning that it refers to data in A, but not vice versa. > > I don't simply want to add new tables to A to implement B, because this > unnecessarily clutters A's schema with tables that entirely extraneous to > it. > > Is there some other way? Have you looked at schemas?
