Search Postgresql Archives

Re: PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes
From: Balazs.Klein@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 13 Apr 2006 13:03:42 -0700
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200604102134.k3ALYvh07983@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Injection-info: z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.2.175.146; posting-account=JdIaAA0AAADPXHV9mtA2D1VeDzRZR32X
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <20060329115308.GA2155@xxxxxxxxx> <200604102134.k3ALYvh07983@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: G2/0.2

Maybe add to it the
          insert/update data in tables based on an XML (a'la MS
updategram)

Balázs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Re: PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes
  - From: Martijn van Oosterhout
- Re: PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes
  - From: Bruce Momjian

Prev by Date: Comparing text field
Next by Date: Where is client/server compatibility documented?
Previous by thread: Re: PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes
Next by thread: Re: PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux