On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:52:40AM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> On 4/10/06, felix@xxxxxxxxxxx <felix@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > What I was hoping for was some general insight from the EXPLAIN
> > ANALYZE, that maybe extra or different indices would help, or if there
> > is some better method for finding one row from 100 million. I realize
> > I am asking a vague question which probably can't be solved as
> > presented.
> >
>
> hmm .. perhaps you can try to denormalize the table, and then use
> multicolumn indices?
That's an idea ... I had thought that since my two referenced tables
are small in comparison to the third table, that wouldn't be of any
use, but I will give it a try. Thanks ...
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@xxxxxxxxxxx
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
