Dave Page <dpage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > GnuTLS is LGPL, which isn't quite as liberal as postgresql's > > license, but should still be ubiqutous enough to be worthwhile. > > The note on the fsf directory (http://directory.fsf.org/gnutls.html) is a little off-putting: > > "The program is currently in development and at an alpha stage." > > Not to mention that from what I can see in a brief Google the Windows > support is somewhat rudimentary. I don't think we should drop openssl support... just include gnutls support so that OS vendors that want to be able to link their libpq against GPL software (like debian) have that choice available. Cheers, Tyler
