Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I don't feel it's a questionable reading of the GPL at all. In fact, > > >> it's pretty clear and I'm about 99% sure the FSF has commented on this > > >> as well. It's true that it's unlikely anyone would actually sue Debian > > >> over it but that doesn't somehow change what the licenses say. > > >> Additionally, I think supporting GNUTLS would be a good thing for > > >> Postgres to do even without this issue. I'd also like to see it support > > >> SASL and a k5login-style user-controllable mapping. > > > > > > So, do GPL have this problem linking against OpenSSL as well? > > > > Yes, that's why GPL apps like Exim and Courier have explicit license > > clauses permitting it. > > So, it's freeradius that needs the exception then, right? Good morning Scott, would you like some coffee? :-) - Tyler