On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 17:16, Tom Lane wrote: > Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > I thought from Douglas' message, it appeared BSD packages didn't need > > such a clause... > > GPL partisans feel that BSD-with-advertising-clause is not compatible > with the GPL. I think the sticking point here is that openssl is using > an advertising clause. But the way Douglas' message read, it was only GPL packages that should be affected, and we're not GPL. Or did I or Douglas misunderstand the situation?
