On 3/31/06, Kai Hessing <kai.hessing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The second one (UPDATE xyz WHERE id IN (xyz1, xyz2, ....) AND > status>-1;) returns: > ------------------ > Seq Scan on phon (cost=0.00..1573304.58 rows=105931 width=148) (actual > time=369563.565..369563.565 rows=0 loops=1) Just a shot in the dark: does the plan stay the same, when you remove the ' AND status > -1' ? -- marko
