--- "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:16:29PM +0300, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 06:03 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > > I'd hope that RH would support at least the > > > most recent version of 7.4, since presumably that's part of what > they > > > pay Tom for... Just understand that 7.4 is approaching > end-of-life. > > > (Presumably so is RHEL2...) > > > > RH won't support a newer (or older) major version of PostgreSQL > which is > > not included in RHEL 2.1. This is Red Hat's policy -- they do not > update > > to new major release in a distribution. I mean, (AFAIR) RHEL 2.1 > ships > > with PostgreSQL 7.3 and they won't support a newer major version. > > > > However, I agree with you, if the support is the primary concern, > there > > are some support options around. > > Oh, I missed that this was actually a 7.3 database. That seriously > limits your options, though at least 7.3 is still supported via > Tom/Red > Hat. Hi Jim, do you mean PostgreSQL 7.3 is supported by RedHat on Advanced Server 2.1? I only found PostgreSQL 7.1.3's rpms for RedHat Advanced Server 2.1, no newer version anymore. Anyway, since I cannot upgrade the operating system, could anybody give me recommendation for which PostgreSQL version is more stable on 2.1? Best regards, Leon __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
