""Alex bahdushka"" <bahdushka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote > > (@)<2006-03-25 20:54:17.528 MST>[26571]LOG: REDO @ D/19176610; LSN > D/19176644: prev D/191765E8; xid 81148979: Heap - clean: rel > 1663/16386/16559898; b > (@)<2006-03-25 20:54:17.528 MST>[26571]LOG: REDO @ D/19176644; LSN > D/191766A4: prev D/19176610; xid 81148979: Heap - move: rel > 1663/16386/16559898; ti > (@)<2006-03-25 20:54:17.528 MST>[26571]PANIC: heap_update_redo: no > block: target blcknum: 1, relation(1663/16386/16559898) length: 1 > (@)<2006-03-25 20:54:17.529 MST>[26570]LOG: startup process (PID > 26571) was terminated by signal 6 > It is like the problem due to the confliction of vacuum & update. The update is on the page that vacuum was just removed. Before we try to understand/attack the bug exactly, first I'd like to see the complete xlog output. Your xlog output is imcomplete -- for example, the first line after "b" should be "lk %u", the second line after "ti" should be "d %u%u". Can you check out why the output looks like that? If you want to examine the source code, look at heapam.c/heap_desc(). Regards, Qingqing
